وَالْغَالِبُand it is commonأَنْthatالتَّحْرِيفَthe distortionاللَّفْظِيِّverbalلَاdoes notيَقَعُoccur،,وَإِذَاand ifوَقَعَit occurs؛;فَإنَّمَاthen it is onlyيَقَعُoccursمِنْfromجَاهِلٍan ignorant person؛;فَالْتَّحْرِيفَfor the distortionاللَّفْظِيُّverbalيَعْنِيmeansتَغْيِيرَchangingالشَّكْلِthe form؛;فَمَثَلًاfor example::فَمَاyou will findتَجِدُyou findأَحَدًاanyoneيَقُولُsays::« الْحَمْدَ لِلَّهِ"Praise be to Godرَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَthe Lord of the worldsبِفَتْحِwith the openingالدَّالِّof the letter dal؛;إِلَّاexceptإِذَاifكَانَit wasجَاهِلًاignorant......هَذَاthisالْغَالِبُis common!!لَكِنَّbutالتَّحْرِيفَthe distortionالْمَعْنَوِيُّthe conceptualهُوَisالَّذِيthatوَقَعَoccurredفِيهِin itكَثِيرٌmanyمِنَofالنَّاسِthe peopleفَأَهْلُSo the peopleالسُّنَّةِof Sunnahوَالْجَمَاعَةِand community.إِيمَانَهُمْTheir faithبِمَاin whatوَصَفَdescribedاللَّهَAllahبِهِwithنَفْسِهِhimselfخَالٍfreeمِنَfromالتَّحْرِيفِdistortion.؛;يَعْنِيmeans::تَغْيِيرَchangeاللَّفْظَthe wordأَوْorالْمَعْنَىthe meaning.وَتَغْيِيرَAnd changingالْمَعْنَىthe meaningيُسَمِّيهِthey call itالْقَائِلُونَthose who sayبِهِof itتَأْوِيلًاinterpretation.،,وَيُسَمُّونَand they nameأَنفُسَهُمْthemselvesبِأَهْلِwith the peopleالتَّأْوِيلِof interpretation;؛;لِأَجْلِIn order toأَنْtoيُصَغُّواthey adornهَذَاthisالْكَلَامَspeechصِبْغَةًcolorالْقَبُولِof acceptance;لِأَنَّbecauseالتَّأْوِيلَinterpretationلَاdoes notتَنْفِرُrepelمِنْهُfrom it.وَلَاnorتَكْرَهُهُdislike itلَكِنَّbutمَاwhatذَهَبُواthey wentإِلَيْهِto it;فِيinالْحَقيقَةِthe truth;تَحْرِيفٍdistortion؛;لَأَنَّهُbecause itلَيْسَis notعَلَيْهِbased on itدَلِيلٌproof;صَحِيحٌcorrect;؛;إِلَّاexceptأَنَّهُمْthey cannotلَاnotيَسْتَطِيعُونَthey are ableأَنْtoيَقُولُواsay::تَحْرِيفًاdistortion;وَلَوْeven ifقَالُواthey saidهَذَاthisتَحْرِيفٌdistortion;؛;لَأَعْلَنُواthey would declareعَلَىagainst;أَنفُسِهِمthemselves;بِرَفْضِby the rejectionكَلَامِهِمof their words.وَلِهَذَاAnd for thisعَبَّرَthe author expressedالمُؤَلِّفُthe authorرَحِمَهُmay he have mercyاللَّهُof Allahبِالتَّحْرِيفِby distortionدُونَwithoutالتَّأْوِيلِinterpretation.مَعَwhileأَنْthatكَثِيرًاmanyمَمَّنْof those whoيَتَكَلَّمُونَspeak
And it is common that verbal distortion does not occur. And if it occurs, it is only from an ignorant person; for verbal distortion means changing the form. For example, you will not find anyone say: "Praise be to God, the Lord of the worlds with the opening of the letter dal, except if he is ignorant... this is common! But the conceptual distortion is what many people have fallen into. The people of Sunnah and community have faith in what Allah has described Himself free from distortion; meaning: changing the word or the meaning. Changing the meaning is what those who say it call interpretation, and they call themselves the people of interpretation; in order to adorn this speech with the color of acceptance, because interpretation does not repel from it and does not dislike it. But what they have gone to in truth is distortion; because there is no proof for it; except they cannot say, it's a distortion; even if they said this is distortion; they would declare against themselves the rejection of their words. And for this, the author expressed distortion without interpretation while many who speak in this matter express the negation of interpretation; they say: without interpretation, but what the author has expressed is more appropriate for four reasons: The first reason is that it is the word that came with the Quran; for Allah, the Most High said: "They distort the word from its places" [An-Nisa: 46], and the expression the Quran expressed is more appropriate than others; it is more indicative of the meaning. The second reason is that it is more indicative of the condition and closer to justice; for the one who interprets without proof is not just to call him an interpreter, rather, it is just to break the rule.
الْوَجْهُthe faceالثَّانِيthe second::أَنَّهُthat itأَدَلُّmore indicativeعَلَىonالْحَالِthe conditionوَأَقْرَبُand closerإِلَىtoالْعَدْلِjustice;فَالمُؤَوِّلُSo the one who interpretsبِغَيْرِwithoutدَلِيلٍproofلَيْسَis notمِنْofالْعَدْلِjustice.،,بَلْbutالْعَدْلُjusticeأَنْtoيَدْعَمَthat it supportsأَخَاهُhis brother;إذْsinceيُعْتَبَرُbe consideredالمُؤَوِّلُthe interpreterمِنْas one ofالْخَطَأَthe mistakes،,فَإنَّمَاSo it is onlyمُؤَوِّلَانِinterpretsإِلَىtoالْحَقِّthe truth،,فَمَنso whoeverصَدَقَhe believesفَلْيَجْزِمْlet him be certainبِأَنَّthatالنَّبِيَّthe Prophetصَلَّىpeace be upon himعَلَيْهِupon himخَاتَمَthe lastالنَّبِيِّينَof the prophets.
The second reason is that it is more indicative of the condition and closer to justice; So the one who interprets without proof is not just to call him an interpreter, rather, it is just to consider the interpreter as one of the mistakes, as it is only that he interprets to the truth; so whoever believes, let him be certain that the Prophet, peace be upon him, is the last of the prophets.