الْحَيَوَانُ،the animal,تِلْكَthatالنَّظْرَةُglanceالْمَجْرُوحَةُhurtوَالْأَسِيَانَةُ،and lamenting,لَاthere is noيُوجَدُexistsفِيهَاin itأَيُّanyفَرَحٍ،joy,أَوْorسَعَادَةٍhappinessأَوْorاقْتِنَاعٍconvictionبِالشَّرْطِwith the conditionالَّذِيthatيَمُرُّpassesبِه.through it.
The animal, that hurt and lamenting glance, has no joy, or happiness, or conviction with the condition it is going through.
وَالْخِزْيُAnd the shameالْحَيَوَانِيُّanimalisticيُضِيءُilluminatesأَنْوَاعًاtypesأُخْرَىotherمِنْofالْخِزْيِshameوَالْعَارِ.and disgrace.
And the animalistic shame illuminates other types of shame and disgrace.
فَفِيSo inالْبُؤْسِthe miseryالْإِنْسَانِيِّhuman،,مَثَلًاfor exampleيُوجَدُthere existsوَعِيٌawarenessبِهَذَاof thisالْبُؤْسِ.misery.
So in human misery, for example, there exists awareness of this misery.
وَفِيAnd inأَحْيَانٍtimesكَثِيرَةٍmanyيَكُونُthere isهَذَاthisالْبُؤْسُmiseryمَطْنَطًاlatentبِالثَّوْرَةِwith revoltعَلَيْهَاagainst itأَيُّwhich meansإِنَّthatشَيْئًاsomethingمَاthatيُمْكِنُcanأَنْtoيَفْعَلَهُdo itالْإِنْسَانُthe humanضَدَّagainstهَذَاthisالْبُؤْسِ.misery.
And in many times there is this misery latent with revolt against it, which means that the human can do something against this misery.
لَكِنَّButالْحَيَوَانَthe animalلَاdoes notيَمْلِكُpossessشَيْئًاanythingمِنْofذَلِكَ.that.
But the animal does not possess anything of that.
لَاDoes notيَمْلِكُpossessالذِّكْرَىmemoryأَوْorالْأَمَلَhopeأَوْorالْوَعْيَ.awareness.
Does not possess memory or hope or awareness.
الْحَيَوَانُThe animalيَعِيشُlivesدَائِمًاalwaysفِيinسِجْنٍprisonحَتَّىevenالْكَلْبُthe dogالَّذِيthatيَخْرُجُgoes outمَعَwithصَاحِبِهits ownerالصَّيَّادِ،the hunter,وَيَجْرِيand runsفِيinالْجِبَالِthe mountainsوَالْمَرَاعِيand meadowsوَالْغَابَاتِand forestsيَحْمِلُcarriesسِجْنَهُits prisonمَعَهُ.with it.
The animal always lives in prison, even the dog that goes out with its owner the hunter, and runs in the mountains and meadows and forests carries its prison with it.
الْكَلْبُThe dogالَّذِيthatيُرَافِقُaccompaniesالصَّيَّادَthe hunterأَوْorالْحِصَانُthe horseالَّذِيthatيَقْفِزُjumpsأَوْorيَجْرِيrunsكَالرِّيحِlike the windفِيinالْمَيَادِينِthe fieldsوَالْمَضَامِيرِand tracksلَاdoes notيَعْرِفَانِknowالسَّعَادَةَ،the happiness,لَأَنَّbecauseسِجْنَهُits prisonمَعَهُwith itلَاdoes notيَغَادِرُهُ.leave it.
The dog that accompanies the hunter or the horse that jumps or runs like the wind in the fields and tracks does not know happiness, because its prison does not leave it.
وَتِلْكَAnd thoseالْحَيَوَانَاتُanimalsالَّتِيthatتَجْرِيrunفِيinالْمَرَاعِيthe meadowsالْحُرَّةُfreeوَالْمُتَوَحِّشَةُand wildالَّتِيthatتَنْقَلُهَاare carriedكَاَمِيراتِby camerasالأَفْلَامِfilmsالوَثَائِقِيَّةِdocumentaryوَالاِكْتِشَافَاتِand discoveriesالْعِلْمِيَّةِscientificهُمْthey areأَيْضًاalsoكَائِنَاتٌbeingsلَاdo notتَعْرِفُknowالسَّعَادَةَ،the happiness,فَثَّمَةَfor there areمِنْthoseيَأْتِيcomesإِلَيْهَاto themقَصْدٌin order toاصْطِيَادِهَا.hunt them.
And those animals that run in the free and wild meadows which are captured by documentary cameras and scientific discoveries are also beings that do not know happiness, for there are those who come to them with the intention to hunt them.
لِذَلِكَThereforeفَهُمْthey areدَائِمُوalwaysالرَّكْضِ،running,وَلَاand do notتَقِفُstopإِلَّاexceptعِندَatغَدِيرٍa pondأَوْorنَبَعٍspringأَوْorعُشْبٍ.grass.
Therefore, they are always running, and they do not stop except at a pond or a spring or grass.
ذَٰلِكَThatهُوَisقَدَرُهَا،its fate,أَوْor«سِرُّهَاits "secret"الْحَيَوَانِيِّ،animalistic,"حَسَبَaccording toتَعْبِيرِthe expressionالْكَاتِبَةِof the authorالْفَرَنَسِيَّةِFrench«جُونِيفِييف"Genevièveجِينَارِي»Ginari"الَّتِيwhoتَكَادُalmostتَكُونَbeالْكَاتِبَةَthe authorالأُورُوبِيَّةَEuropeanالْوَحِيدَةَonlyالَّتِيthatتَحْدُثُtalkedعَنْaboutالْشَّرْطِthe conditionالْحَيَوَانِيِّanimalisticبَعْدَafterجُورْجGeorgeأُورْوِل.Orwell.
That is its fate, or its "animalistic secret," according to the expression of the French author "Geneviève Ginari" who is almost the only European author who talked about the animal condition after George Orwell.
عِندَمَاWhenتَحَدَّثَtalkedأُورْوِلOrwellعَنْaboutمُعَانَاةِthe sufferingالْحَيَوَانَاتِ،of the animals,تَحَدَّثَtalkedعَنْaboutخِزْيِهَا،their shame,وَكَأَنْهَاas if it wereأُخْتٌsisterالإِنْسَانِhumanفِيinالْوَعِيِawarenessوَالشَّرْطِand the conditionوَالْوُجُودِ.and existence.
When Orwell talked about the suffering of the animals, he talked about their shame, as if it were a sister of the human in awareness and condition and existence.
فَهِيَIt isتَعِيشُlivesفِيinمَزْرَعَةٍa farmتُسَمَّىcalledمَزْرَعَةِfarmالْقَصْرِthe palaceالَّتِيthatفِيinمِلْكِيَّةِowned byهَذَاthisهَذَاthis
It lives in a farm called the palace which is owned by this.