الْمَبْحَثُThe discussionالثَّالِثُthird
The Third Discussion:
وَيَتَضَمَّنُIt includesالْآتِيthe following
It includes the following:
١1مَنْWhoتَناوَلَdiscussedمَسْئَلَةَthe issueفَنَاءِof the endالنَّارِof the fire.
1. Who discussed the issue of the end of the fire other than Ibn Taymiyyah.
٢2مَوْقِفُThe positionشَيْخِof SheikhالإِسْلاَمِIslamمِنْonمَسْئَلَةِthe issueفَنَاءِof the endالنَّارِof the fire,وَآرَاءُand the opinionsالعُلَمَاءِof the scholarsفِيonذَلِكَthisوَمُنَاقَشَتُهَاand their discussion..
2. The position of Sheikh Islam on the issue of the end of the fire, and the opinions of the scholars on this and their discussion.
وَإِلَيْكَAnd here isتَفْصِيلُthe detail
And here is the detail:
أَوَّلًاFirst:,مَنْWhoتَناوَلَdiscussedمَسْئَلَةَthe issueفَنَاءِof the endالنَّارِ, غَيْرَother thanابْنِIbnتَيْمِيَّةَTaymiyyah:
First: Who discussed the issue of the end of the fire other than Ibn Taymiyyah:
قَبْلَBeforeالشُّرُوعِstartingفِيtoالتَّعَرُّفِrecognizeعَلَىthe positionمَوْقِفِofشَيْخِSheikhالإِسْلاَمِIslamمِنْonمَسْئَلَةِthe issueفَنَاءِof the endالنَّارِ, يَجْدُرُit is importantمَعْرِفَةُto knowأَمْرٌa matterمُهِمٌّimportant,أَلَّاthat is notوَهُوَand it is:بَيَانٌclarifyingمَنْwhoتَكَلَّمَspokeفِيinهَذِهِthisالْمَسْئَلَةِissueغَيْرَother thanابْنِIbnتَيْمِيَّةَTaymiyyah,فَإِنَّforالْمُتَتَبِّعَthe one who followsلَهَاitفِيinمَظَانِّهَاits sourcesيَجِدُwill findالعُلَمَاءَscholarsالسَّابِقِينَprecedingعَلَىonابْنِIbnتَيْمِيَّةَTaymiyyahوَالَّاحِقِينَand those who followedلَهُhim,قَدْhaveتَكَلَّمُواdiscussedفِيهَاin itتَارَةًat timesبِذِكْرِby mentioningالرِّوَايَاتِthe narrativesالْوَارِدَةِreportedعَنْaboutالسَّلَفِthe predecessorsفِيهَا, وَأَحْيَانًاand sometimesبِالإِشَارَةِby referencingإِلَىtoهَذَاthisالْقَوْلِsayingوَذِكْرِand mentioningالْخِلَافِthe disagreementفِيهin it,وَقَدْand manyأَشَارَindicatedإِلَىtoذَلِكَthatجَمْعٌa groupمِنْofالعُلَمَاءِscholarsمِنْهُمْinclude them:
Before starting to recognize the position of Sheikh Islam on the issue of the end of the fire, it is important to know an important matter, which is clarifying who spoke about this issue other than Ibn Taymiyyah. For the one who follows it in its sources will find that the scholars preceding Ibn Taymiyyah and those who followed him have discussed it sometimes by mentioning the narratives reported about the predecessors in it, and sometimes by referencing this saying and mentioning the disagreement in it. And many scholars have indicated this, including:
عَبْدٌAbdابْنُIbnحَمِيدٍHamidفَقَدْwho indeedذَكَرَmentionedالرِّوَايَاتَthe narrativesفِيinتَفْسِيرِهِhis interpretation:
Abd Ibn Hamid has mentioned the narratives in his interpretation:
(١)(1)وَعَبْدُand Abdالْحَقِّal-HaqqابْنُIbnعَطِيَّةِ‘Attiyyahالأَنْدَلُسِيِّthe Andalusianفِيinتَفْسِيرِهِhis interpretation:
(1) And Abd al-Haqq Ibn ‘Attiyyah the Andalusian in his interpretation:
(٢)(2)وَالْفَخْرُand al-Fakhrالرَّازِيُّal-Raziفِيinتَفْسِيرِهِhis interpretation:
(2) and al-Fakhr al-Razi in his interpretation:
(٣)(3)وَالْقُرْطُبِيُّand al-Qurtubiفِيالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِوَالتَّذْكِرَةِ وعنها
(3) and al-Qurtubi in al-Tadhkirah:
(٤)(4)وَابْنُand IbnأَبِيUbayالعِزِّal-Azzالْحَنَفيُّthe Hanafiفِيinشَرْحِthe explanationالطَّحَاوِيَةِof al-Tahawiyyah:
(4) and Ibn Ubay al-Azz the Hanafi in the explanation of al-Tahawiyyah:
(٥)(5)وَابْنُand Ibnالْقَيِّمِal-QayyimفِيinحَادِيHadiالأَرْوَاحِal-Arwah:
(5) and Ibn al-Qayyim in Hadi al-Arwah:
(٦)(6)وَهُوَand he isأَوْسَعُهُمْthe most extensiveكَلَامًاin speech,وَمُحَمَّدٌand Muhammadالأَمِينُal-Aminالْشَّنْقِيطِيُّal-Shanqitiفِيinكِتَابِهِhis book:دَفْعَRefutingإِيْهَامِthe insinuationالإِضْطِرَابِof contradiction
(6) and he is the most extensive in speech, and Muhammad al-Amin al-Shanqiti in his book: Refuting the insinuation of contradiction.
(١)(1)أَوْرَدَهُHe cited itابْنُIbnالْقَيِّمِal-Qayyimفِيinشِفَاءِthe cureالعَلِيلِof the sick:ص٤٣٥p. 435.
(1) He cited it Ibn al-Qayyim in the cure of the sick: p. 435.
(٢)(2)الْمُحَرِّرُThe conciseالْوَجِيزُsummaryفِيinتَفْسِيرِthe interpretationالْكِتَابِof the bookالْعَزِيزِthe Mighty٧/٤٠٢7/402ط.Publish.قَطَرٍQatar.
(2) The concise summary in the interpretation of the Mighty book 7/402, Publish. Qatar.
(٣)(3)التَّفْسِيرُThe interpretationالْكَبِيرُthe greatلِلرَّازِيof al-Razi١٨/٦٣18/63.
(3) The great interpretation of al-Razi 18/63.
(٤)(4)٥٢٦526.
(4) 526.
(٥)(5)ص٤٨٠-٤٨٦p. 480-486.
(5) p. 480-486.
(٦)(6)ص٣٤٠-٣٧٩p. 340-379.
(6) p. 340-379.