وَالتَّسْلِيمَاتِand the submissions-andوَمَوَاقِفِthe stances ofشُعُوبِهِمْtheir peoplesوَأَقْوَامِهِمْand their nationsمَعَهُمْwith them
and the submissions - and the stances of their peoples and nations with them.
٥5--عِلْمُThe science ofالتَّذْكِيرِremindingبِالْمَوْتِof deathوَمَاand whatبَعْدَis afterالْمَوْتِdeath
5 - The science of reminding of death and what is after death:
كَالْحَشْرِsuch as the gatheringوَالنَّشْرِand the resurrectionوَالْحِسَابِand the reckoningوَالْمِيزَانِand the scaleوَالْجَنَّةِand Paradiseوَالنَّارِand the Fire
such as the gathering and the resurrection, the reckoning and the scale, and Paradise and the Fire.
وَيَرْجِعُAnd refersتَفْصِيلُthe detailing ofهَذِهِtheseالْعُلُومِsciencesوَبَيَانُهَاand their clarificationوَذِكْرُand the mentioning ofالْأَحَادِيثِthe hadithsوَالْآثَارِand reportsالْمُتَعَلِّقَةِrelatedبِهَاto themإِلَىtoالْوَاعِظِthe preacherوَالْمُذَكِّرِand the reminder
The detailing of these sciences, their clarification, and the mentioning of the hadiths and reports related to them refer back to the preacher and the reminder.
أُسْلُوبُThe style ofالْقُرْآنِthe Quranالْكَرِيمِthe Nobleفِيinعَرْضِpresentingالْعُلُومِthe sciencesالْقُرْآنِيَّةِQuranic
The style of the Noble Quran in presenting the Quranic sciences:
وَقَدْAnd hasجَاءَتْcomeهَذِهِtheseالْعُلُومُsciencesفِيinالْقُرْآنِthe Quranالْكَرِيمِthe Noble
These sciences have come in the Noble Quran
عَلَىuponطَرِيقَةِthe method ofالْعَرَبِthe Arabsالْأَوَّلِينَthe earliestلَاnotعَلَىuponمَنْهَجِthe methodology ofالْعُلَمَاءِthe scholarsالْمُتَأَخِّرِينَthe later ones
upon the method of the earliest Arabs, not upon the methodology of the later scholars.
فَلَمْSo it did notيَلْتَزِمْadhereفِيinآيَاتِthe verses ofالْأَحْكَامِrulingsطَرِيقَةَto the method ofالْإِيجَازِconcisenessوَالِاخْتِصَارِand brevityكَمُؤَلِّفِيlike the authors ofالْمُتُونِthe textsالْفِقْهِيَّةِjurisprudential
In the verses of rulings, it did not adhere to the method of conciseness and brevity like the authors of jurisprudential texts,
وَلَاnorطَرِيقَةَto the method ofتَنْقِيحِrefiningالْحُدُودِthe definitionsوَالْقُيُودِand restrictionsكَمَاasيَفْعَلُهُdoes itالْأُصُولِيُّونَthe jurisprudential theorists
nor to the method of refining definitions and restrictions as the jurisprudential theorists do.
وَقَدْAnd hasالْتَزَمَadheredفِيinآيَاتِthe verses ofالْجَدَلِdebateوَالْمُخَاصَمَةِand contentionإِيرَادَto bringingالْأَدِلَّةِthe evidenceالْمَشْهُورَةِfamousالْمُسَلَّمَةِacceptedوَالْبَرَاهِينِand the proofsالْخِطَابِيَّةِrhetoricalلَاnotتَنْقِيحَrefiningالْبَرَاهِينِthe proofsوَتَقْسِيمَهَاand dividing themعَلَىuponطَرِيقَةِthe method ofالْمَنْطِقِيِّينَthe logicians
In the verses of debate and contention, it adhered to bringing famous, accepted evidence and rhetorical proofs, not refining proofs and dividing them upon the method of the logicians.
وَلَمْAnd it did notيُرَاعِobserveفِيinالِانْتِقَالِthe transitionمِنْfromمَقْصِدٍa purposeإِلَىtoآخَرَanotherوَمِنْand fromمَوْضُوعٍa subjectإِلَىtoمَوْضُوعٍsubjectآخَرَanotherتِلْكَthatالْمُنَاسَبَةَappropriatenessالَّتِيwhichيُرَاعِيهَاobserves itالْأُدَبَاءُthe litterateursالْمُتَأَخِّرُونَthe later ones
In transitioning from one purpose to another, and from one subject to another subject, it did not observe that appropriateness which the later litterateurs observe;
بَلْratherأَلْقَىit castعَلَىuponعِبَادِهِHis servantsمَاwhatرَآهُHe saw itمُهِمّاًimportantسَوَاءٌwhetherكَانَit wasمُقَدَّماًput forwardأَوْorمُؤَخَّراًput back
rather, it cast upon His servants what He saw as important, whether it was put forward or put back.